Kurtis Patel | Why Process Review Is Essential for Continuous Improvement

Process review is one of the most effective ways to improve manufacturing performance over time. Rather than waiting for problems to surface, regular review allows teams to identify inefficiencies and address them before they affect output. Kurtis Patel views process review as a proactive discipline that supports consistency and scalability.

Manufacturing systems evolve. As volume increases, new equipment is introduced, or suppliers change, processes may drift from their original design. Without review, these changes accumulate quietly, increasing complexity and reducing efficiency. Process review brings visibility back to how work is actually being done.

Kurtis Patel emphasizes that review should focus on patterns rather than isolated outcomes. Variability in cycle times, recurring deviations, or frequent workarounds often indicate deeper structural issues. By examining these signals, teams can adjust workflows, improve communication, or simplify steps that no longer add value.

Process review also supports cross-functional alignment. When teams from development, manufacturing, and quality review processes together, they gain a shared understanding of constraints and priorities. This alignment reduces friction and improves decision-making.

Importantly, process review does not require constant change. Sometimes the outcome is confirmation that a process is working as intended. Other times, small adjustments yield meaningful improvements. The value lies in maintaining awareness and intentionality.

According to Kurtis Patel, continuous improvement depends on visibility. Regular process review ensures that manufacturing systems remain aligned with current demands and capable of supporting long-term growth without disruption.